Literature is always representative
of the time it was written. This is because the author is a byproduct of his
environment. 17th century England was a confusing, dark, rigidly
constructed, and constraining time period and Walpole’s Castle of Otranto draws in the appropriate fears to frighten and
delight a contemporary audience.
Walpole deals with environmental fears
such as darkness, and storms. To a modern day reader these fears are almost
nonexistent. Aside from rare circumstances of extreme weather, a modern day
reader can almost always avoid these situations. The world is filled with
lights, flashlights, stabile and frequent shelter, raincoats, and cars. Someone
in 2013 rarely needs to fear getting caught away from home unprepared for the
weather. 17th century readers did not enjoy these luxuries. To get
caught outside unprepared could mean your death. A particularly strong storm
might destroy your home, or leak through your primitive roof meaning you were
not even safe in your own home. When the sun went down, and darkness fell,
there was no work around. This darkness creates a perfect environment of
mystery and misunderstanding which harbors all things dreadful and
supernatural.
Science in the 17th
century was laughable. People were still very dependent on the supernatural for
providing explanations questions, which could not be answered. Today, there is
scientific method and theory, and many of those questions have been answered.
In the 17th century the supernatural was less extraordinary, and
more accepted. That is not to say that the power of the supernatural was lost
on Walpole or his contemporaries. Since the supernatural served as the
traditional method of explaining things, and had such an integral part in their
lives, when the supernatural was warped and made dreadful the effect was all
the more powerful. A skeleton hermit in a hood was not something to be
questioned, but something to be feared and respected.
Equally as important in 17th
century England was the respect for the Church. Walpole displays the Church as
a shining beacon of light, Matilda wishes to be a nun, Hippolita would be happy
doing the same, Jerome is a pious and just man who resists Manfred’s cruelty,
and offers sanctuary to Isabella. Here the church is doing exactly what the
church should be doing. What 17th century readers feared was the
breakdown of the status quo. Much of The
Castle of Otranto focuses on people behaving as they should not or being
afflicted by troubles foreign to their station. Manfred is cruel rather than
magnanimous, Isabella is husband less rather than married to Conrad, Matilda is
dead and in love with a peasant rather than alive and married to a nobleman,
Hippolita has a disloyal husband, Theodore is a peasant, than a prisoner, than
a dueling knight, and finally a prince. 17th century England was
built on a strict class system, and the chaos ensuing around the breakdown of
this system was a real fear. In modern day society where social mobility is high,
this fear is foreign. The breakdown of the system was not the only fear. The
system working correctly was also frightful because it left woman almost
powerless to their male counterparts.
Walpole was able to create a work, which
frightened his contemporaries. Audiences love a good scare. There is something
to be said for the simple pleasure, the rush of endorphins, which a good scare
can deliver. Except one does not have to risk all the actual side effects which
would accompany such a scare. No need to actually duel your future father in
law, go face to face with a giant, see the ruin of a castle, or the death of a
young groom by falling helmet. This scare takes place in a controlled
environment. When one has had too much all one has to do is close the book.
Walpole allowed 17th century readers to experience that rush by
drawing in very real fears and making them “scary fun” rather than “scary you
might die.”
Your point about audiences loving a good scare hits home with me. For some reason I've always been attracted to video games with lots of things jumping out at me and a real need to search for things to keep the character alive. That being said, I would definitely not want to experience these things in real life, much like the 17th century reader probably wouldn't really want to experience seeing a youth being crushed with a helmet. However, I wonder if it's just a rush of endorphins or if there's not something more to the attraction of Gothic literature? Perhaps people like it for the act of trying on the dark side of life or because they have some deep twisted fantasy they'd like fulfilled or simply because they like to imagine another sort of life. Maybe it's even a combination of these.
ReplyDelete