The
nature of the updating of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s most popular Sherlock tale
is evident in the titles of these two adventures. Doyle’s original, The Hound of the Baskervilles, becomes The Hounds of Baskerville. The story,
like the title, is changed just a bit. However, every shift or update
successfully refers back to the original, linking the fears of the past to the
fears of the present. As fear has evolved, old fears have been done away with,
and require a revitalizing to make them scary again.
Many gothic stories occur within the
confines of a ruined castle or abbey. The original Hound story does not take place in a decaying building but instead
accomplishes the same feat by occurring in a decaying landscape. The castle or
abbey, stationed high in the mountains, is meant to serve as a place where the
past, and the gothic, can run rampant. The moor accomplishes this by being isolated,
mysterious, and unconquered. Something
similar to Hugo Baskeville’s exploits could be accomplished in a place like the
moor. In fact, criminals are still fleeing into the moor (believable as of
1901) because the moor is a place where the long arm of the law gets snagged
and cut on brambles or shrapnel.
The moor is sufficiently isolated to allow the growth of the
gothic, and in Doyle’s time an unconquered landscape was scary enough.
Mysterious sounds, supernatural entities, and dangerous neighbors provided most
of the fear in Doyle’s text. However, as modern society has progressed, old
fears don’t shake us like they used to. Flashlights can be used to see in the
dark. Shazam will tell you if that’s the howl of a death hound or merely the
latest Justin Bieber chorus. A mysterious neighbor can be Facebooked until
their intentions are made clear. Stuff that used to be scary just isn’t scary
anymore. To regothic the gothic several changes had to be made.
The original moor gets dark and scary at night, fog blocks
your vision, there’s an escaped murderer on the loose, pits that’s will swallow
you or your pony are scattered about, and there’s an undead dog on the loose.
Flashlights eliminate a lot of the fear associated with night and fog. Escaped
murderers rarely escape from modern prisoners, and are usually tracked down
within hours. Google Maps and a developed road system means that no man need
stray into the muck of the moor, and undead dogs are more attractive than
scary. To bring the fear back to the moor the update laced the fog with drugs.
Hidden mines replaced the pits scattered about the moor, a high security
military installation doing questionable research makes the moor even more
mysterious and serves as an updating of the prison at Dartmoor.
The convict is mentioned in the updated tale only in passing
and never shows up again. Relying on the military installation as an updated
Dartmoor prison, the convict merges with a dangerous scientist to rehorrify our
fear of escaped prisoners. The updated version relied heavily on science to
horrify what was previously scary because of the supernatural. Supernatural
isn’t scary to a modern society because we think we have a lot of the answers,
science doesn’t support this theory or there’s no evidence of that monster, so
it must not exist. That’s what makes science particularly scary, and
particularly gothic. People in modern times trust science, its familiar, and we
want to believe it. Science cure small pox and brought us the iPhone, when it’s
turned into a malignant rather than benevolent agent, we’re scared. That’s why
an evil scientist makes the perfect bad guy. Gas, and military agencies, and
corporate greed, are all updates that play to our modern fears. A mutant
hellhound is scary, but a hellhound that isn’t there at all is gothic.
Holmes and Watson need updating because their dynamic is
outdated. Crime fighting duos aren’t comprised of a genius and a fool anymore.
Our world is built on teamwork between highly capable people who rely on each
other to make a perfect team, a perfect team comprising of one man doesn’t
exist. We have problems with someone who is that smart, so Holmes is given a
diagnosis, this makes us feel okay about his perceived abnormality. Watson goes
toe to toe with Holmes at times and we can see that Holmes is seriously flawed,
and needs Watson to guide him through awkward social settings. Another factor
that needed updating was how the story is presented to the audience. A modern
audience isn’t happy enough sitting through the whole story in the dark. To
update this the audience is allowed to look inside Holmes mind, and the story
comes to a more conclusive and transparent ending than the original.
Science
is a huge factor in the update but the role of science in creating a scary dog
was also present in the original. Phosphorous was used to make the hound appear
more frightening, just like gas was used to make a normal dog appear hellish.
Both bad guys were scientists, one a virologist and the other a lepidopterologist.
A lot of cute throw backs were included like Holmes’ need for a stimulant, Sir
Henry becoming Henry Knight, Holmes uncanny abilities to figure stuff out, and
the introduction of the case (the visit from a distressed client, not the
details).
The Hound of the
Baskervilles reveals a
bit about what scared people during the 19th century, and about the
evolution of fear since that time. A lot of the fears of that time have been
conquered and to make the story scary again, new fears, unconquered fears, have
to be introduced. A lot of that updating can be done with the aid of science,
which serves the same role as the supernatural did in the 19th
century. The dynamic between Watson and Holmes, as well as the ending, needed
updating to offer a more balanced relationship, and a clear satisfying ending.
This story doesn’t represent a new definition of the gothic anymore than The Hound of the Baskervilles represented
the gothic in its day. This was just another tale gothic tale, not “the” gothic
tale. The Hound of the Baskervilles is as different but as gothic as The Yellow Wall-Paper. The updating
doesn’t define or usher in a new era of the gothic. This story like the
original is simply a single manifestation of the gothic.
Great title. I also a fan of the introduction about the abbey, I think that's a really good explanation of why that setting works.
ReplyDeleteI'm interested in what you have to say about a modern audience needing a good team. Why do you think this is? It is a little hard for me to accept that idea when there are wildly successful movies like Iron Man where Tony Stark is the main guy and his only ally in the first movie (which to my knowledge is by-and-large considered the better of the two) is a girlfriend who really just gives him a little push. I'm not completely against the idea that a dynamic duo is a better choice for today's audience though. Perhaps as far as Holmes and Watson goes the audience would need to see a dynamic duo but if so, why is this? I'm interested in what you have to say here.
I agree with Mr. Myers: the team gives us the most enduring heros because they can play off each other. For example, we have Skywalker/Solo, Frodo/Sam, Gilgamesh/Enkidu, Beowulf/Wiglaf, Achilles/Patroclus, and The Tick/Arthur to name a few over time and cultures. Check out Ironman again: after the first movie, he is given team-mates.
ReplyDelete